The Past, Present and Future of Airline Flight Training Departments

The Past, Present and Future of Airline Flight Training Departments

During the early days of airline flight training, there were no simulators like the ones we see today. Training was done in the aircraft. There was a powerful incentive to do well, as no one wanted to crash the airplane. There was also a tendency to not get too close to the edge of the aircraft envelope.

Ground school at major Airlines was very demanding; The instructor would place two three-inch binders  in front of each new hire and state, “Have these memorized within two weeks.” During the oral exam, pilots were expected to draw every system on the blackboard and be ready to explain how each system worked, including limitations, pressures, temperatures, and voltages. The training was a very adversarial experience, with instructors always trying to “stump the chump” in an everlasting game of “You bet your Job.”  The trainees worked hard to ensure they were prepared for the check ride after six simulator periods. During the final training event, If a trainee was good, the instructor would often keep loading the trainee until the aircraft was barely flyable. If the trainee kept the aircraft flying, the sixth simulator would often be considered a successful check ride. It was a badge of honor for a pilot to say, “ I completed six sims.”

Safety of flight is a non-negotiable item in training. Training and checking, however, does not have to be adversarial and can be just as much fun as flying the line. Pilots should look forward to training events.

Instructors need to look through the eyes of the average line pilot and ask themselves, “What can I do to make pilots want to operate the aircraft by Standard Operating Procedures (SOP)?” Instructors should explain why procedures are in place. Many procedures have been written with blood on bent aluminum. 

If pilots understand why they do things, they are much more likely to do it. Instructors should create an environment where pilots are confident that they can ask any question without fear of reprisal. If the instructor does not know the answer, the instructor must find the answer and get back to the pilot. When asked the “what if” questions, instructors can explain that those “what if” questions must be valid for the operation.Instructors must be the keepers of SOP. They must never teach their technique as SOP. Techniques are an excellent tool to train pilots how to comply with SOP but can never be a replacement for SOP. Instructors, when able, should fly the aircraft. It puts things in perspective for the instructor and provides instructors with street credibility, which is very important among line pilots. Passing the line also provides the opportunity for instructors to demonstrate correct SOP. By doing these things, instructors will earn high respect from the line pilots.

In the regional world of aviation, training departments are tasked with turning a single-piston pilot into a swept-wing jet pilot. This quantum leap for inexperienced pilots also lays the foundation for their careers as airline pilots. The responsibility for this falls upon training leadership. In addition to the items listed above, all members of the training team must not only exhibit the company's core values and the training center's values. Those training center values should include mutual respect, excellence in instruction, Servant Leadership, Loyalty to the training department and trainees, Integrity in everything they do, and Selfless service to all trainees. Managers should show appreciation for training department personnel whenever possible and validating all fellow employees.

 " Safety of flight is a non-negotiable item in training. Training and checking, however, does not have to be adversarial and can be just as much fun as flying the line. Pilots should look forward to training events."

Flight training departments should be success-oriented and never try to “trip up” any trainee. Flight training programs are challenging, and instructors should give trainees all the support they need to succeed, but ultimately, trainees have to be successful in earning their licenses and ratings. Flight safety cannot be compromised, and training departments must not give away permits to pilots who have not demonstrated the required level of competency.

Training leadership must never stand still in the present. Training leaders must continually look at how the current and future generations of pilots learn and how to continue providing high-quality instruction. Leaders can never say, this is how we have always done training, and it is good enough.

Author Bio:

Captain Lance Lau is a retired airline captain with 20,000 hours of line flying and 15,000 hours of simulator training given during his 44 year career in aviation. He was a Boeing 737 LCA, instructor/evaluator and APD as well as a Boeing 777 instructor/evaluator and APD. Captain Lau has flown Boeing 707, 727, 737, 747, 777, McDonald Douglas DC-10, DC-3 and NAMC YS-11 aircraft. He is currently the Director of Training for a regional air carrier in the United States.

 

Read Also

Innovating Defense: Leadership, Ai, And Resilience

Dominic Perez, Chief Technology Officer at Curtiss-Wright Corporation (NYSE: CW)

Strategic Solutions for Aircraft Maintenance Challenges

Nolan Elrod, Manager of Maintenance Contracts at Republic Airways

Future-Proofing Airport Safety: Intersection of Innovation, Regulation and Leadership

Travis Krabbenhoft, Director of Airport Safety, Denver International Airport

AI's Pervasive Impact in Aerospace and Defense Beyond Cybersecurity

Milad Shaheen, Vice President of Engineering, CIRCOR Aerospace & Defense

How Digital Biomarkers are Driving Forward Our Fight Against Cognitive Disease

Leesa Soulodre, MiM MBA, General Partner, R3i Ventures

Tech Investing: Starting Smart

Igor Ryabenkiy, Founder and Managing Partner at AltaIR Capital