Finance and economics | Buttonwood

Should you put all your savings into stocks?

As markets roar, an old argument returns

A balanced scale of eggs that should not balance
Illustration: Satoshi Kambayashi

Less than two months of 2024 have passed, but the year has already been a pleasing one for stockmarket investors. The S&P 500 index of big American companies is up by 5%, having passed 5,000 for the first time ever, driven by a surge in enthusiasm for tech giants, such as Meta and Nvidia. On February 22nd Japan’s Nikkei 225 passed its own record, set in 1989. The roaring start to the year has revived an old debate: should investors go all in on equities?

A few bits of research are being discussed in financial circles. One was published in October by Aizhan Anarkulova, Scott Cederburg and Michael O’Doherty, a trio of academics. They make the case for a portfolio of 100% equities, an approach that flies in the face of longstanding mainstream advice, which suggests a mixture of stocks and bonds is best for most investors. A portfolio solely made up of stocks (albeit half American and half global) is likely to beat a diversified approach, the authors argue—a finding based on data going back to 1890.

This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline "The 100% strategy"

Is Europe ready?

From the February 24th 2024 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Finance and economics

What campus protesters get wrong about divestment

Will withdrawing money hurt Israel?

Hedge funds make billions as India’s options market goes ballistic

The country’s retail investors are doing less well


Russia’s gas business will never recover from the war in Ukraine

Hopes of a Chinese rescue look increasingly vain